Anyone go from a 16-35 GM to the Tamron 17-28 for Sony? Or at least have experience comparing the two for landscape/Astro? Please let me know why you went one direction or the other.
I tried… The Tamron is way too slow. And the edges are not as good.
I used to own a tampon 24-70mm 2.8 and I know own a Sony 16-35mm 2.8. The Sony is so much better than what the tamron was. It’s worth the extra cost to me. I have two gm lenses from Sony and I find both of them to be amazing